By: Khalid Baig
With the latest in-your-face act of the Facebook, the issue is once again attracting headlines. Should Muslims react? How should they react? Where do they stand on the philosophical issue underlying all this?
In the media the issue has been framed as a clash between two camps. One camp stands for freedom of expression. The other wants to curtail it. Needless to say the first camp is enlightened and virtuous. The other is a relic of the dark ages. The clash in other words is between a civilized and civilizing West and Islam that just refuses to be civilized.
Once you accept this framing of the whole issue, the outcome is already decided. Are you for freedom of expression or not? It is a loaded question, and just like the yes/no question, “Have you stopped beating your wife?” no matter how you answer it, you remain guilty.
Look at the
typical Muslim response which begins, “We also believe in freedom
of expression but…” It matters little what you say after that. It
is obvious that you are trying to add exclusions and limitations to a
basic moral value while the other side is asking for no such limits.
It is not difficult to see which side will come out ahead.
But
this predicament is a result of uncritically accepting a false
statement about the nature of the clash. For the real clash is not
between those who are for and those who are against a freedom. Rather
it is between two different freedoms. On the one hand is the freedom
to insult. On the other is freedom from insult. Whether it was the
Satanic Verses of the 1980s or the Cartoons of 2005 and their endless
reproduction since then, if they stand for any freedom, it is freedom
to insult. Pure and simple. Muslims, on the other hand, have stood
for and demanded freedom from insult. Nothing more. Nothing
less.
These are certainly opposing values. You can be for one or the other. And the question does arise, which one is a better value.
To see that let us imagine a society that truly believes in the first as a cherished moral value. It celebrates freedom to insult and guards it at all costs. Every member of it enjoys this freedom and practices it regularly. In a business everyone insults everyone else. The boss is insulting the employees, the employees are insulting the bosses. The salesmen are insulting the customers. The accountants are insulting the creditors. Everyone is enjoying the great freedom to insult. The same is true of the home. The parents are always insulting the children. The children are constantly insulting the parents. The spouses are incessantly insulting each other. And in doing so they all stand on the high moral ground because freedom to insult is such a fundamental freedom on which the society is built.
Actually contrary to the claims of the pundits if the Western society was truly built on this “cherished moral value,” it would have perished a long time ago — consumed by the fires of hatred and negativity generated by this freedom. No home, no neighborhood, no village, no business, no organization and no society can survive for long if it makes freedom to insult as a cornerstone of its freedoms. Clearly most who advocate this freedom do not practice it in their daily lives. But they are making an exception in the case of Islam and Muslims. The driving force behind this is not any great moral principle but a deep rooted hatred born of ignorance.
Software professionals sometimes use a term called
beature. It stands for a bug turned into a feature. A bug is a defect
in the software. A feature, on the other hand, is a desirable
attribute. A beature is a defect that is presented (thanks to slick
marketing) as a feature. Freedom to insult is also a beature. It is
the growing sickness of Islamophobia in the West which is being
presented as a high moral value, packaged by the slick marketing
departments as freedom of expression.
Well, whether or not freedom
to insult is a Western value, Islam has nothing to do with it. It
lays emphasis on its exact opposite: the freedom from insult. It
values human dignity, decency, and harmony in the society. The
freedom of religion it ensures includes freedom from insults. While
it does not shy away from academic discussion of its beliefs and
showing the falsehood of non-Islamic beliefs, it makes sure that the
discussion remains civil. In those discussions it wants to engage the
intellect of its opponents; in contrast those who itch to insult
their opponents are interested in satisfying their vulgar emotions.
Thus while its most important battle is against false gods it asks
its followers to refrain from reviling them. (Qur’an, Al-anam,
6:108). It also reminds them to stay away from harsh speech. “Allah
loves not the utterance of harsh speech save by one who has been
wronged.” (Qur’an, Al-Nisa, 4:148). Prophet Muhammad, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, who is being reviled by the scum of the world, taught Muslims to never let the low moral standards of their adversaries dictate theirs.
As
a result of these teachings Muslims can never even imagine insulting
any Prophet — from Adam to Moses to Jesus to Muhammad, peace be
upon them all. Even when they ruled the world, Muslims treated the
religious leaders of non-Muslim also with respect – even during
battles. In the Baghdad court Jewish and Christian scholars engaged
in open discussions with the Muslim savants. Needless to say they had
not been attracted by the freedom to insult but its exact opposite.
Freedom from insult is a fundamental value that assures peace and harmony. It leads to healthy societies. And Muslims are very proud of their impeccable record here.
What is true of a home or a village is also true of the world as it has become a global village. Now, more than ever before, the world needs the harmony and tolerance that can only be assured by the freedom from insults.